Translate

Saturday, March 21, 2015

BestBuyMadeira Promo

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Prepare for euro-dollar parity—and fast


As the euro trades around a 12-year low against the dollar, analysts believe euro-dollar parity will be reached soon—and that the single currency could weaken even further.
It comes as the European Central Bank's quantitative easing (QE) program to stimulate the euro zone's lackluster economy got underway on Monday.
Expectations of the move – which will see euros flood the market -- sent the currency below $1.1000 for the first time since September 2003 on Friday. The currency has since weakened further and in afternoon trade Wednesday, the euro was stuck around $1.058.
Now analysts are questioning how long it will take for the euro to reach parity with the dollar – and potentially fall below 1:1 against the greenback.
"I think we're heading towards parity and that's the logical conclusion of where we're heading next," David Zahn, head of European Fixed Income at Franklin Templeton, told CNBC Wednesday.
"Originally, I was thinking next year (we'd see parity), but at the rate we're going it does seem like it could be much sooner than that."

Jill Dyson | Getty Images
But he said the ECB shouldn't be worried at the rate of decline yet, adding: "I think they will become concerned if the pace becomes too quick."
Michael Hewson, chief market analyst at CMC Markets, said the single currency had the potentially move even lower.
"Few would have imagined in May last year when EURUSD was trading just shy of 1.4000 that nearly 10 months later the currency would have slid nearly 35 percent to be trading just short of 1.0700 with the potential to go even lower," he said in a note, entitled "How low can the euro go?" on Wednesday.
"The next target sits at 1.0500 -- the March 2003 low -- and it remains a very short hop from there to parity."
A senior currency strategist at Societe Generale agreed that the euro was headed to $1.05 and could reach parity with the dollar in a few weeks.
"The size of the move you're seeing is really a reflection of the intensity of QE and it's forcing people to realize that they own too many of the euro assets…$1.05 is going to come fairly soon and parity is a possibility in the next few weeks," Sebastien Galy told CNBC Tuesday.
However, Galy warned that it was, "very rare for the market to be so right at the start of the year and not get burned very badly at some point," and that some consolidation was likely.

'Euroglut here to stay'

Currencies tend to weaken during QE as the bond purchases by central banks boost the amount of money in circulation. Lower interest rates compound the effect as they encourage consumers to spend and businesses to invest, boosting the economy. 
A weak euro is broadly positive for the struggling euro zone, and should help it tackle deflation and stimulate the region's exports, which become cheaper in the global market as a result.
Conversely, a strengthening dollar worries U.S. exporters, as it makes their products more expensive in foreign markets.
The weakness in the euro has been compounded by concerns that Greece – which is battling an ongoing economic crisis -- could ultimately leave the single currency and others could follow, undermining the future of single currently. Expectations of a rate hike by the Federal Reserve on the back of a strengthening U.S. economy is also giving the dollar a boost.
The ECB's 1 trillion euro bond buying program has, predictably, causedthe yields on euro zone sovereign debt hit record lows (and, conversely, prices to rise) and has led investors to look for higher returns elsewhere.
Strategists at Deutsche Bank warned that capital outflows from the euro zone could be greater than anticipated by the ECB, putting more pressure on the euro.
"The euro-area's huge current account surplus reflects a very large pool of excess savings that…combined with ECB quantitative easing and negative rates (will) lead to large-scale capital flight from Europe causing a collapse in the euro and exceptionally depressed global bond yields," Deutsche Bank strategists George Saravelos and Robin Winkler said in a note Tuesday.
"The greater the European outflows, the more the euro can weaken and the lower global bond yields can stay," they added. "We now foresee a move down to 1.00 by the end of the year, 90 cents by 2016 and a new cycle low of 85 cents by 2017."
Ominously for ECB President Mario Draghi, who spoke at a conference organized by the Center for Financial Studies in Frankfurt on Wednesday, Saravelos and Winkler warned that, "Europe will continue being a major source of global imbalances for the rest of this decade."
- By CNBC's Holly Ellyatt, follow her on Twitter @HollyEllyatt. Follow us on Twitter: @CNBCWorld

Dollar-euro parity: What a one-to-one exchange means


As the euro's value sinks, the dollar-euro parity could affect your plans: whether you are investing in foreign markets or just planning a spring vacation in the south of France. 
The strong greenback against plunging euro prices means there could soon be a one-to-one exchange rate between the currencies. And the magical state of parity is a significant marker not only because it eliminates the cost of exchanging money—but also because it is a rare occurrence.
The last parity moment was in November 2002. Parity also occurred when the euro was introduced in 1999, and in 2000. So why now? The two currencies getting cozy signifies an ongoing trend in changing money supplies and disparate central bank policies between the United States and the European Union.
A clerk handles dollars and euros at a money exchange office in Paris.
Philippe Desmazes | AFP | Getty Images
A clerk handles dollars and euros at a money exchange office in Paris.

What causes currency prices to change?

Because the United States and euro zone have floating exchange rates, the price of money is set by the market, not a government: supply (from the central bank) and demand for the currency. 
Demand fluctuates based on factors including the expected inflation or deflation of the currency over time, the perception of a country as a stable place to hold valuable assets, the level of currency reserves needed for purchases, and interest rates.

Why the euro is shrinking

The euro is getting weaker because we know the supply will go up. The European Central Bank has started an aggressive economic stimulus in the form of quantitative easing—in which it is buying bonds off the public-private markets in exchange for cash. Those purchases will flood the market with euros. 
In fact, that's the goal. Like the United States did, the European Union hopes to keep money cheap and accessible to its residents to spur economic growth.
But by the law of supply and demand, when there is more to go around, each euro is worth less. A glut of euros is particularly important because currency is seen as a store of value. Like we count on investments to create a return, we count on cash to buy as much as it did yesterday, minus a tiny but predictable amount of inflation each year.
Because the euro is becoming less valuable and has less purchasing power abroad, it's not seen as a valuable way to hold assets, meaning that people may dump euro-denominated assets for an asset with more return.

What is causing the dollar to get stronger?

As a result, the dollar is being seen as a more stable alternative to the euro and has relatively more purchasing power abroad. Compounding the situation, while rates of return in Europe spiral downward, the Federal Reserve is planning to raise interest rates and reduce the money supply—meaning that dollar-denominated assets will become more valuable. 

What does this mean for businesses?

American businesses that operate in Europe could feel the strain of dollar-euro parity because it means that it is relatively more expensive to buy their products. It also means that when U.S. companies bring their earnings back across the Atlantic, they dilute their euro-denominated earnings, which are now worth less than they used to be. 
Even earlier in 2015, as the dollar strengthened and the euro weakened, multinational corporations like Procter & Gamble and Caterpillarblamed the strong dollar for disappointing earnings.

What does it mean for consumers?

While a rising dollar hurts U.S. businesses selling exports, it helps consumers looking for European imports.
If you're throwing around the idea of buying a villa in Tuscany, now's your chance. When the cost of exchanging money is eliminated, it will make any purchase in Europe relatively cheaper. Prices of goods can't readjust right away to keep up with foreign demand. Those Haribo bears are priced for the locals, which mean you can get a steal.

How long will it last?

No one knows for sure, but it's likely that the moment of parity—the golden one-to-one ratio—will be brief. The overall currency trend of a beefy dollar and weak euro, however, may be more long term. 

With Greece and Germany squabbling over the sluggish economy and a Fed decision to raise rates looming, the forces that are driving a wedge between the demand for euros and dollars may carry on for a while.

Saturday, March 7, 2015

André Rieu - And The Waltz Goes On

BlackBerry unveils Leap smartphone; continues shift to software

Leap_Grey_Front
BlackBerry had billed “a very strong device roadmap” in the buildup to its Mobile World Congress presence this year. What the company showed at its press conference this morning was a full touch screen smartphone, called Leap.
BlackBerry’s CEO John Chen also promised a curved-screen handset with a separate keyboard to come out “as soon as it’s done.” In addition, the company stressed the integration of its software into Samsung’s KNOX workspace.
The Leap smartphone comes with a five-inch 1280 x 720 touch screen and no keyboard and will cost $275. But the latest BlackBerry handset “will find it tough to compete with the iPhone and Android devices,” according to analyst house CCS Insight. However, the research company added that “the Leap will be essential to a more-rounded portfolio.”
In the meantime BlackBerry made it clear it remains heavily focused on developing cross-platform software services that Chen said will extend to “any end point” – i.e any IP address – “whether it is a vending machine or a rice cooker”. In addition to developing a software platform to address the internet of things market, BlackBerry is aiming its enterprise mobility software at the vertical sectors of healthcare, finance and government.
“We’re expanding into the software and services business and doing it quickly,” said Ketan Kamdar, global head of device portfolio, BlackBerry.
Hardware still accounts for the majority of BlackBerry’s revenues, according to Chen, who admits “it will take some time for hardware and software to be twin towers”.
In its effort to build up software revenues quickly BlackBerry is working with any operating system, whether it is Windows, Android or iOS. In particular, BlackBerry underscored its collaboration with Samsung to “create a highly integrated experience” for BlackBerry’s enterprise software on Samsung KNOX. The strategy of putting BlackBerry’s enterprise software and encrypted messaging functions onto Samsung phones could call into question the future of BlackBerry handsets. However, for now BlackBerry claims to be committed to continuing to develop handsets aimed at the enterprise market.
BlackBerry’s enterprise software services include secure access, and a split billing function that lets companies pay only for work-related voice, data and SMS usage. The company, which cites operators as its key channel, also showed collaboration tools, such as one-touch conference call dial that does away with the need to enter passwords.

Say hello to messages on Pinterest

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Google Data centers - Where the Internet lives

Google To Offer Wireless Data Plans In Hopes Of Getting More People Using All Of Their Products

(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
MOUNTAIN VIEW (CBS/AP) – Search giant, self-driving car developer, smartphone and tablet maker. Turned data plan provider?
Google wants more people to get online so they can search around and click on its ads. And it’s shaking up the telecom world to do it. The company said Monday at the wireless show in Barcelona, Spain, that it will soon sell data plans for smartphones and tablets in the U.S. The announcement confirmed leaks and media reports in late January that Google planned to enter the telecom market.
More information will be released “in the coming months,” Sundar Pichai, Google Inc.’s senior vice president of products, said during his presentation.
The move into the wireless market mirrors what Google has been trying to do for hard-wired Internet access at home. The Mountain View company currently sells an ultra-fast fiber-optic Internet service in a handful of markets scattered across the U.S. in an attempt to pressure long-established broadband providers to improve their prices and cut their prices.
Google conceivably do something similar for wireless by offering discounted data plans that would pressure major carriers such as AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications to offer better deals and services or risk losing customers to a powerful rival.
“Any time there is a new entrant with the resources and imagination of Google, it most definitely could shake up the market,” said Gartner analyst Bill Menezes.
Pichai downplayed the competitive threat that Google might pose.
“We don’t intend to be a network operator at scale,” he said. “Our goal here is to drive a set of innovations which we think the ecosystem should evolve and hopefully will get traction.”
Pichai compared Google’s latest move to its decision to launch its own line of Nexus smartphones, which he said Google uses not to compete with other smartphone makers, but to introduce innovations in mobile hardware.
Finding a way to provide a “seamless” Internet connection when a device moves from Wi-Fi to cellular coverage as one example of goals Google would like to target, Pichai said. He also noted that Google is also working on “Android Pay,” a mobile payment system similar to “Apple Pay,” that will work across all Android-powered devices.
Google plans to be a “mobile virtual network operator,” which means it will lease space on an existing system. Pichai didn’t name Google’s wireless partners, but previous media reports have identified Sprint Corp. and T-Mobile US Inc. Neither of those carriers has confirmed those plans yet.
Selling Google access to their wireless networks would help Sprint and T-Mobile recoup some of their extensive investments. If Google’s entry into the wireless market is successful, the company may even try to take over Sprint or T-Mobile, Menezes said. “This could end up being a ‘try it and then buy it’ strategy,” he said.
T-Mobile already has been lowering its prices and rolling out other wireless plans that have undercut the status quo. Some of those changes have prodded AT&T and Verizon to take steps that have helped their existing customers save money.
Google is constantly looking for ways to get more people online in an effort to drive more traffic to its Internet-leading search engine, Gmail and YouTube video site. All those services display the ads that generate most of Google’s revenue. Google also collects commissions on millions of ads distributed to other sites.
The company is using solar-powered drones and a fleet of high-altitude balloons to beam Internet service in some parts of the world.

Google has developed a technology to tell whether ‘facts’ on the Internet are true


Cables at a Google data center. (Courtesy Google)
The Internet, we know all too well, is a cesspool of rumor and chicanery.
But in a research paper published by Google in February — and reported over the weekend by New Scientist — that could, at least hypothetically, change. A team of computer scientists at Google has proposed a way to rank search results not by how popular Web pages are, but by their factual accuracy.
To be really clear, this is 100 percent theoretical: It’s a research paper, not a product announcement or anything equally exciting. (Google publishes hundreds of research papers a year.) Still, the fact that a search engine could effectively evaluate  truth, and that Google is actively contemplating that technology, should boggle the brain. After all, truth is a slippery, malleable thing — and grappling with it has traditionally been an exclusively human domain.
Per this recent paper, however, it’s not too difficult for computers to determine whether a given statement is true or false. Basically, to evaluate a stated fact, you only need two things: the fact and a reference work to compare it to. Google already has the beginnings of that reference work, in the form of its Knowledge Graph — the thing that displays “August 15, 1990” when you search “Jennifer Lawrence birthday,” or “American” when you search “Obama nationality.”
Google culls those details largely from services like Freebase, Wikipedia and the CIA World Factbook; a separate, internal research database, called Knowledge Vault, can also automatically extract facts from the text on Web pages. Whichever database we’re talking about, Google structures these ‘lil factoids as things called “knowledge triples”: subject, relationship, attribute. Like so:
(Jennifer Lawrence, birthday, August 15 1990)
(Barack Obama, nationality, American)
(Somalia, capital, Mogadishu)
… so to check if a fact found in the wild is accurate, all Google has to do is reference it against the knowledge triples in its giant internal database. And to check whether a Web page or a Web site is accurate, Google would just look at all the site’s knowledge triples and see how many don’t agree with its established body of facts.
The distant suggestion, these researchers write, is that Google’s version of the truth would iterate over time. At some point, perhaps even Google’s hotly debated and much-studied ranking algorithm — the creator and destroyer of a million Web sites! — could begin including accuracy among the factors it uses to choose the search results you see.
That could be huge, frankly: In one trial with a random sampling of pages, researchers found that only 20 of 85 factually correct sites were ranked highly under Google’s current scheme. A switch could, theoretically, put better and more reliable information in the path of the millions of people who use Google every day. And in that regard, it could have implications not only for SEO — but for civil society and media literacy.
It’s worth noting, in fact, that the Barack-Obama-nationality example comes straight from the Google report, which would seem to imply that the technology’s creators envision it as a tool against stubborn misconceptions and conspiracy theories.
“How do you correct people’s misconceptions?” Matt Stempeck, the guy behind LazyTruth, asked New Scientist recently. “People get very defensive. [But] if they’re searching for the answer on Google they might be in a much more receptive state.”
Increasingly, information intermediates like Google have begun to take that suggestion seriously. Just three weeks ago, Google began displaying physician-vetted health information directly in search results, even commissioning diagrams from medical illustrators and consulting with the Mayo Clinic “for accuracy.” Meanwhile, Facebook recently launched a new initiative to append a warning to hoaxes and scams in News Feed, the better to keep them from spreading.
It’s unclear exactly what Google plans to do with this new technology, if anything at all. Still, even the possibility of a search engine that evaluates truth is a pretty incredible breakthrough. And it definitely gives new meaning to the phrase “let me Google that for you.”
Liked that? Try these:

Google's Proposal for North Bayshore

Shawn Mendes - Never Be Alone

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Forbes 2015 Billionaires List: Which Tech Tycoon Beat Mark Zuckerberg and Scored the Number 1 Spot?

Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos
Tech tycoons Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos all made the Forbes 2015 Billionaires list.Credit: Michael Gottschalk/Photothek via Getty Images; Justin Sullivan/Getty Images; T.J. Kirkpatrick/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Looking for a new best friend? Forbes has released its list of the world's Top 500 biggest billionaires in 2015, who come from a variety of professions and backgrounds. 
Topping the list yet again was Microsoft mogul Bill Gates, who has a net worth of $79.2 billion. Forbes has listed Gates as no. 1 for 16 of the last 21 years, and he has been in the top 10 since 1993. Though his nearly $80 billion is nothing to scoff at, in 1999, Gates had surpassed $100 billion and was known as a "centibillionaire." 
At no. 16 is Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg with a net worth of $33.4 billion, just shy of Amazon.com tycoon Jeff Bezos at $34.8 billion. 
Christy Walton and Liliane Bettencourt are the only two women to make it into the Top 10 of the Forbes 2015 Billionaires list.
Christy Walton and Liliane Bettencourt are the only two women to make it into the Top 10 of the Forbes 2015 Billionaires list.
Credit: Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images; Victor Boyko/Getty Images
Two women made it into this year's top 10 — Walmart's Christy Walton holds the no. 8 spot with $41.7 billion and L'Oreal's Liliane Bettencourt comes in at no. 10 with $40.1 billion. 
Mexican tycoon Carlos Slim Helu snagged the no. 2 spot with $77.1 billion and Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett came in at $72.7 billion. 
Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg came in at no. 14 with $35.5 billion and Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin landed the 19th and 20th spots, respectively, with $29.7 billion and $29.2 billion. 
Designer Ralph Lauren scored the no. 193 spot on the Forbes 2015 Billionaires list.
Designer Ralph Lauren scored the no. 193 spot on the Forbes 2015 Billionaires list.
Credit: Randy Brooke/WireImage
Further down the list sits controversial media mogul Rupert Murdoch at no. 77 with $13.9 billion, and fashion designers Giorgio Armani and Ralph Lauren occupy the no. 174 and 193 spots, respectively, with Armani netting $7.6 billion and Lauren bringing in $7 billion. 
Though he hires celebrities to be his apprentices, Donald Trump barely made the list, tying with 12 other billionaires for no. 405 with $4.1 billion. And Oprah Winfrey didn't make the Top 500, scoring the no. 603 with her $3 billion.
Forbes released its list of 2015's biggest billionaires.
Forbes released its list of 2015's biggest billionaires.
Read more: http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/forbes-2015-billionaires-list-bill-gates-mark-zuckerberg-201523#ixzz3TJe1HFEd
Follow us: @usweekly on Twitter | usweekly on Facebook